Dollars for Genocide or American Security?
Not that this is intended as an endorsement for Cohen. No, I don't like Cohen's politics, but not because he is
a Jew.
But a campaign devoted almost exclusively about race and religion
should be a factor in any voting decision. Herenton has not repudiated Matthews', with whom he has an
ongoing political relationship according to Matthews himself, extreme comments and agitations.
One white caller in Southern California listening via the internet said Cohen had received money
from Turkish interests to vote against persistent resolutions to condemn that country for the genocide of the
Armenians. (This is also an interest of mine, but I doubt I represent any voting block among non-Armenians in this district.
Recomendation: THE BURNING TIGRIS,
The Armenian Genocide and America's Response By Peter Balakian, New York: HarperCollins Publishers.)
Anyway, turns out the caller is an Armenian Genocide documentarian that Cohen, who opposes recognition
of the genocide on pragmatic grounds regarding Turkey, an American ally adjacent to a war theatre,
had physically by Cohen's own hands thrown out of a press conference in August, 2008 at his home.
At any rate, the documentarian, Peter Musurlian, was glad to
accept Matthews invitation as telephone guest before the primary to dish dirt on Cohen. From what I remember seeing on TV
of Cohen throwing the guy out his front door, I would be too. Here may be a commonality between Cohen and Herenton:
similar media skills.
Anyway, Matthews didn't bite and chew like a dog
on a bone, as he does with any flimsy issue in which he can insert a race component. Here allegedly was a
Jew accepting
money to keep the spotlight off a genocide. Given Matthew's race binges, how exploitable is that?
Maybe its just too hard to be an anti-Semite on one hand and object to our country's unwillingness to recognize a
another genocide on the other. Somehow, doesn't feel quite right to pick and choose genocides for political reasons.
WMC-TV's Cabal with Yacoubian
Back to the theme of this piece: the utter lack of need to invoke racialist rhetoric. Even if you were thinking in
purely Machiavellian terms, to deploy divisive race and religion
within local politics, is just one of Herenton's strategic blunders that begin with the
conceptually flawed "Just One" campaign theme, a concept for which Matthews takes credit,
not unsurprisingly.
"Just One"
refers to the makeup of the Tennessee
Congressional delegation, composed of eleven members, all white. The idea goes like this:
"one" refers to having one black in
the delegation
because blacks deserve "at least" one black member because the 9th Congressional District
was redrawn specifically for black representation, Matthews contends.
If that racial appeal fails Herenton--and it looks like it will as of the recent
Yacoubian poll (below)--will Matthews, and/or Herenton, consider the election to be illegitimate?
But his racial arguments to get votes among Memphis blacks has not only
not worked, especially among young blacks judging from voter returns and lack of young callers on his show,
it gets in the way of otherwise valid, discussable arguments. Case in point,
according to WMC-TVs Yacoubian poll issued Monday, Herenton doesn't have a chance.
But it's not that Matthew's criticism is necessarily off--yes, its hard to believe
Herenton would only get fifteen percent of the vote, thus raising questions about
methodology, wording and population characteristics polled. But the low and easy road
on how and why Yacoubian arrived at his
numbers is apparent to Matthews, if not Herenton:
The poll was done by a Jew for a Jew.
Exhorted Matthews on air,
"All of this is a part of a bigger scheme to keep you away from the polls, but don't
be tricked. Do not be bamboozled. Do not be fooled. [3 words unintelligible] Now you
know. You got Channel 5 that goes to a Jew to do a poll on another Jew. When have you
known Jews not to stick together? Not like us! They ain't like us! When have we known
a Jew not to stick with a Jew? So Channel 5 gets themself a Jew to poll a Jew and the Jew
comes back and says that the other Jew is going to beat the black by sixty five percent!"
To reinforce his pet theory, he says it again a few minutes later.
"Is there any area you do not understand? That Channel 5 got a jew to poll a Jew and
the Jew that did the polling for the other Jew came back and said that the Jew was going
to get sixty five percent of the vote." The Minister of Propaganda would
be proud.
Here's Your Improvised Explosive Device for Your Little Campaign, Fellas
But one politician doesn't support Thaddeus' buddy Willie Herenton: President Barach Obama,
who endorsed, in writing and in a primary, Cohen.
The most powerful man in the world, uh, who happens to be black elected by a majority white nation, set off a presidential IED underneath
the soft underbelly of their flawed political tank. Nomatter how nervously they pretend to downplay it and
ask themselves in mock innocent confusion "why?" (OH, GOD WHY!) the answer is obvious, other than political payback
for Cohen's support in his health care bill.
Even Obama drew the line at getting stuck with Herenton and his baggage. Little does he need an extreme
political white basher on his congressional Democratic team. Let's avoid another Rev. Wright (whom
Sydney Chism, Herenton's campaign manager, could be
compared).
A part of Obama's thinking as got to be: do I need a Herenton headache in Congress when daily hot button racial stories
pop up like blistery pimples? Pimples like the NAACP calling the Tea Partiers "racist" for no particular reason and
my own justice
department refusing to prosecute Black Panther thugs who intimidate voters. All he'd need is for Herenton to borrow from
Matthews' zeitgeist and start propounding like the little professor he pretends to be
why blacks should only do business
with blacks and are bereft of normal human prejudices. Yeah, right. Hello, again, Fox News.
The Political Game of No Shame
Obama's endorsement put Herenton's and Matthews underwear in a tight knot that insists on riding up due to their own
racial rhetoric. For example, by Matthew's own divisive
words they are forced to play the President of the United States as a "bourgeois Negro" simply because he supports
Cohen, a white candidate. Herenton's, oh, excuse me, Matthew's, arguments land
squarely into the yesteryear of the early civil rights struggles.
Puzzling then, that Matthews would turn, in transparent self-service, on historic local civil rights figure, Maxine Smith,
who he says is accused in a book of providing the FBI with information leading to the death of Martin Luther King:
"How is it that you can applaud this Negro woman, this sellout of a Negro with her light complexion?
How can you engage her, how can you embrace her in the African American community when she's a sellout of Dr. King
back in the early sixties? So it is not surprising that she has attached herself to a Jew in this community or
a white man in the community that does not love black people who did not speak to black people prior to his going
to Congress...?
To label blacks who support a white candidate as "house Negroes," "sellout Negroes," and even men who, shall
we say, have no testicular presence, in the face of the presidential endorsement, is nothing short of pitifully
forlorn.
Matthews can attack Yacoubian's predictive successes, but his own record of trying to influence local politics is
not impressive. (see previous articles)
I hope he returns to "gadflying" existing politicians, including Herenton if he can given their relationship,
and not trying to be a political power broker.
Respond
related previous
Thaddeus Matthews first story, links to followups
Willie Herenton's Campaign Kickoff with pictures (scroll down when there)
Charlotte Bergmann, 9th Cong.
Rep. primary candidate
*with apologies to the late Hunter S. Thompson,
Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas